Re: [tor-dev] Extending deadline for small features in 0.2.3.x by one week (to the 13th)

2012-01-10 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > On 01/09/2012 06:01 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: >>> >>> Should I make such a branch and request it for review? >> >> I don't think this is a good idea for 0.2.3.x without data.  Specif

Re: [tor-dev] Sanitizing IPv6 addresses in bridge descriptors

2012-01-10 Thread Linus Nordberg
Karsten Loesing wrote Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:45:03 +0100: | - Write 3 bytes of the sanitized IPv6 address in [::] notation. We're | writing sanitized IPv4 addresses as 10.x.x.x. Is there a counterpart | for IPv6 addresses? It should be obvious that these are "private" | addresses, but I'd like to

[tor-dev] Sanitizing IPv6 addresses in bridge descriptors

2012-01-10 Thread Karsten Loesing
Hi Linus, Ian, list, now that we have bridges running on IPv6 addresses, some bridge operators enabled that feature on their public bridges and published descriptors to the bridge authority. I wonder how to sanitize these addresses for metrics data. (Currently, lines containing IPv6 addresses ar