Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2011-10-20 Thread Robert Ransom
On 2011-10-20, Nick Mathewson wrote: > 4.3. Separate bridge-guards and client-guards > >In the design above, I specify that bridges should use the same >guard nodes for extending client circuits as they use for their own >circuits. It's not immediately clear whether this is a good id

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2011-10-20 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Ian Goldberg wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:09:17PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote: >>    Note that this design does not require that our stream cipher >>    operations be transitive, even though they are. > > Did you mean "commutative"? Indeed so. Fixing. th

Re: [tor-dev] Survey on Tor Trac usage and how you manage your tasks

2011-10-20 Thread Erinn Clark
* Karsten Loesing [2011:10:19 16:12 +0200]: > 2. Try harder to include diffs in tor-wiki-changes notifications. I > looked for an option that does this in Trac 0.12, but didn't find one. > Erinn, do you know how we could implement this change? I found this: http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/1660

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 188: Bridge Guards and other anti-enumeration defenses

2011-10-20 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:09:17PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote: >Note that this design does not require that our stream cipher >operations be transitive, even though they are. Did you mean "commutative"? - Ian ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev