On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 19:36 -0400, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> Torouter based on openwrt is an experiment. It seems it's going to
cost
> us more time, effort, and people than we have to spare. The entire
> torouter, or bridge/relay-by-default in hardware, is an experiment.
>
> I'd much rat
Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Anyway, here's the client-side sibling proposal to the
> already-implemented 174. It cuts down time-to-first-byte for HTTP
> requests by 25 to 50 percent, so long as your SOCKS client (e.g.
> webfetch, polipo, etc.) is patched to support it. (With that kind of
> speedup, I
