Looks like we lost tor-dev somewhere. Quoting Nick's reply without
cutting out stuff I have no comments to.
On 9/22/11 10:16 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Karsten Loesing
> wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> and here are a few comments to your proposal 185:
>>
>> On 9/20/11
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:33:42PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> Design: Indicating variable-length cells.
>>
>> Beginning with the v3 link protocol, we specify that all cell
>> types in the range 128..255 indicate variable-length ce
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:33:42PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Design: Indicating variable-length cells.
>
> Beginning with the v3 link protocol, we specify that all cell
> types in the range 128..255 indicate variable-length cells.
> Cell types in the range 0..127 are still used for 512-
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:49:04AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 9/20/11 9:34 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > Configuration:
> >
> > Add a new torrc option, "DirCache". Its values can be "0", "1",
> > and "auto". If it is 0, we never act as a directory cache, even
> > if DirPort is set.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Karsten Loesing
wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> a few comments to proposal 186 below:
>
> On 9/21/11 8:13 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> In consonance with our changes to the (Socks|Trans|NATD|DNS)Port
>> options made in 0.2.3.x for proposal 171, I make a corresponding
>>
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > I assume it can take several seconds for the exit relay to stop sending
> > data and the Tor client has to continue reading from the stream to keep
> > the circuit usable. Is that correct?
>
> Yes. The cl
Hi Nick,
and here are a few comments to your proposal 185:
On 9/20/11 9:34 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Configuration:
>
> Add a new torrc option, "DirCache". Its values can be "0", "1",
> and "auto". If it is 0, we never act as a directory cache, even
> if DirPort is set.
Do these relay
Hi Nick,
a few comments to proposal 186 below:
On 9/21/11 8:13 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> In consonance with our changes to the (Socks|Trans|NATD|DNS)Port
> options made in 0.2.3.x for proposal 171, I make a corresponding
> change to allow multiple SocksPort options and deprecate
> Socks
