If you want to confirm whether a UDP or TCP port (or range of ports) is being
blocked or not, try http://www.firebind.com
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
> I have begun using the Python TorCtl package to develop a gui TOR
> controller.
Great! What are your planned use cases for this gui? Kamran is also
beginning work on a gtk gui for arm (http://www.atagar.com/arm/ - a
python project that uses torctl) so that might be of interest too.
We'd certain
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:14:52PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > On 06/11/2011 07:58 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> >> Yes, but the client (say, inside China) is perfectly capable of
> >> artificially fragmenting its SYN packet. It shouldn't be too hard to
> >> check what actually happens in this c
> On 06/11/2011 07:58 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
>> Yes, but the client (say, inside China) is perfectly capable of
>> artificially fragmenting its SYN packet. It shouldn't be too hard to
>> check what actually happens in this case? (At least, for the current
>> GFW configuration.)
>
> No it wouldn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/11/2011 07:58 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Yes, but the client (say, inside China) is perfectly capable of
> artificially fragmenting its SYN packet. It shouldn't be too hard to
> check what actually happens in this case? (At least, for the curr
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:21:53PM +0200, tagnaq wrote:
> On 06/11/2011 06:59 PM, tagnaq wrote:
> >> Hmm. I wonder what happens if the packets are fragmented so that the
> >> TCP port information isn't in the first fragment...
>
> An IP packet must be very small to fulfil this scenario (first IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/11/2011 06:59 PM, tagnaq wrote:
>> Hmm. I wonder what happens if the packets are fragmented so that the
>> TCP port information isn't in the first fragment...
An IP packet must be very small to fulfil this scenario (first IP
fragment is so sm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ian, I made a new thread to avoid this discussion in the
'The Torouter and the DreamPlug' thread.
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +0200, tagnaq wrote:
>>> > > Doesn't "make random people into public (middle-only) relays" have the
>>> > > (well
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +0200, tagnaq wrote:
> > Doesn't "make random people into public (middle-only) relays" have the
> > (well maybe not "problem", but "issue"?) that when GFW blocks them, they
> > (the random people who bought an Excito/etc.) won't be able to connect
> > to anything
I have begun using the Python TorCtl package to develop a gui TOR
controller. So, I am looking at the TorCtl source to understand how
to use it properly. In this examination, I have begun adding
comments, renaming vars to be more explicit, etc. How open are the
developers to these changes?
Fabian Keil wrote:
> and...@torproject.org wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K
> > bytes in 39 lines about:
> > : I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
> >
> > This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a h
On 6/11/11 2:41 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:17:35AM +0200, karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote 2.5K
> bytes in 34 lines about:
> : > Do you plan to fix links in the mailing list archives as well? How
> : > about links in our e-mail inboxes?
> :
> : Nope. But we could
and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K
> bytes in 39 lines about:
> : I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
>
> This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a highly secured front
> door that onl
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:43PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 15K bytes
in 322 lines about:
: I think we should re-flash with an OS that makes hardening a priority. We
: should only harden the OS in the sense that we should strip out anything
: that we do not require for our uses. Debian and
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:12:25PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 1.7K bytes
in 39 lines about:
: I did not suggest a backdoor! I suggested a method of remotely helping
This comes across as "it's not a backdoor, it's a highly secured front
door that only law enforcement will have access to in o
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:17:35AM +0200, karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote 2.5K
bytes in 34 lines about:
: > Do you plan to fix links in the mailing list archives as well? How
: > about links in our e-mail inboxes?
:
: Nope. But we could add redirects for those pages linked from the
: mailing list
16 matches
Mail list logo
