On 6/11/11 6:13 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:08:46 +0200
> Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>> By the way, what happens if we rename wiki pages? I guess Trac will
>> update all internal links, but external links (e.g., from the website)
>> will be broken? We could fix our own websi
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:08:46 +0200
Karsten Loesing wrote:
> By the way, what happens if we rename wiki pages? I guess Trac will
> update all internal links, but external links (e.g., from the website)
> will be broken? We could fix our own website, but other websites would
> still be broken. H
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:15:43 +
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>> I think that we should probably setup a hidden service on each one and
>> ensure that we can remotely administrate them with the consent of the
>> testers. This will help us to
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:15:43 +
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> I think that we should probably setup a hidden service on each one and
> ensure that we can remotely administrate them with the consent of the
> testers. This will help us to perhaps make some of these choices differently
> down the road
>
> I haven't converted my DreamPlug to Debian yet, but will try to do
> this over the weekend. I'll be sure to document the process as well.
>
Ok. This seems like a good starting point:
http://blog.davideaves.com/archives/2011/03/21/installing_debian_gnulinux_6_0_1_squeeze_on_the_dreamplug/
I lov
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
>> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote
> 2.9K bytes in 75 lines about:
> >> : The whole point wit
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote
> 2.9K bytes in 75 lines about:
> > : The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
> > : bridge or a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 2.9K
>> bytes in 75 lines about:
>> : The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
>> : bridge or a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 2.9K
> bytes in 75 lines about:
> : The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
> : bridge or a relay, so I see a web interface as something mandatory. So
> :
On 6/10/11 1:30 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2011-Jun-10 12:08, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> [..]
>> Here's my plan: I'd like to rename (possibly a lot of) wiki pages so
>> that the naming scheme implies a kind of wiki structure. I'd also add a
>> page saying where stuff should go, and we'll beat up
On 6/10/11 2:03 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:08:46PM +0200, karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote 7.5K
> bytes in 279 lines about:
> : I think the main problem is that there's no obvious structure in the
> : wiki, so everyone just adds their stuff anywhere, maybe thinking
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:08:46PM +0200, karsten.loes...@gmx.net wrote 7.5K
bytes in 279 lines about:
: I think the main problem is that there's no obvious structure in the
: wiki, so everyone just adds their stuff anywhere, maybe thinking that
: someone else will move it to the right place. The
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 01:56:25PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 2.9K
bytes in 75 lines about:
: The whole point with the Torouter is to allow more people to run a
: bridge or a relay, so I see a web interface as something mandatory. So
: yeah, we'd have to make sure that the interface is se
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 15K bytes
in 359 lines about:
: What's the rational there? While we certainly need more bridges, I'd like to
Our funding for this project is to create more bridges to allow censored
users to access the less-censored Internet from
On 2011-Jun-10 12:08, Karsten Loesing wrote:
[..]
> Here's my plan: I'd like to rename (possibly a lot of) wiki pages so
> that the naming scheme implies a kind of wiki structure. I'd also add a
> page saying where stuff should go, and we'll beat up everyone not
> adhering to the structure in a jo
Hello everyone,
Today I looked at our wiki to add roadmaps for some products and
realized what a mess the wiki is. This wasn't obvious to me, because I
stopped using the wiki long ago, well, because it was such a mess. But
boy, it has become worse!
I think the main problem is that there's no ob
> this is just a way to encourage network operators
>(who want to play nice) to run more than a middle node without a
> lot of overhead. Or do I misunderstand?
You're fine. I was only speaking of the internet path between the
exit and regular internet services. Such as what happens if a Tier-1/2
p
18 matches
Mail list logo
