On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:34:17 +
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:40 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> >
> > > Some thoughts from a quasi network operator...
> > >
> > > Perhaps a tracking reason not to do this...
> > >
> > > No
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:34:17 +
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:40 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
> > Some thoughts from a quasi network operator...
> >
> > Perhaps a tracking reason not to do this...
> >
> > Normally exit traffic is free to travel the globe across jurisdictions
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/2011 09:57 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>> Sounds like a plan. I prefer bridge by default, but we can discuss that
>>> later.
>>>
>> What's the rational there? While we certainly
On 2011-Jun-09 23:34, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> For Tor itself doing some programmatic things... There are plenty
> of BGP looking glasses out there. But for the purposes of some
> script banging away at them (times the number of nodes doing so),
> yes, it is definitely considered pr
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:40 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Some thoughts from a quasi network operator...
>
> Perhaps a tracking reason not to do this...
>
> Normally exit traffic is free to travel the globe across jurisdictions
> on its way to its final destination (ie: webserver). Doing this
> forces th
Some thoughts from a quasi network operator...
Perhaps a tracking reason not to do this...
Normally exit traffic is free to travel the globe across jurisdictions
on its way to its final destination (ie: webserver). Doing this
forces that traffic to sink at the exit jurisdiction... removing
that p
>
> > I think it's fine to ship one web interface for us now and later find a
> good
> > integration point with the Freedom Box later...
>
> Yep, I agree.
>
>
Great. I'm sure that if the web UI is free software and it works well, we
can see if the FB will be interested in using it.
> > What's the
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew L
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > > Sounds like a plan. I prefer bridge by default, but we can discuss that
> > > later.
> > >
> > What's the rational there? While we certainly need more bridges, I'd like
> t
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:50:09PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> > Sounds like a plan. I prefer bridge by default, but we can discuss that
> > later.
> >
> What's the rational there? While we certainly need more bridges, I'd like to
> see an increase in relays and encourage more Friend of Friend
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> >> > Ja
On 2011-Jun-09 20:07, Linus Nordberg wrote:
[..]
> I'm already running something[1] that is collecting a feed and storing
> it in an SQL database. I should tech it i) how to emit torrc Export
> lines and ii) the Tor control protocol ("exit-policy/default").
If you want an IPv6 dump (aka grh.sixxs
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
>> > Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> >
>> >> > We would also need a way for users to e
Dear Roger
Thanks for your response. I read the spec document about the RELAY_DROP
cells. You say that no one has understood the passive correlation attack to
utilize the RELAY_DROP cells. I am however little curious to see if
"moderate padding" (enough to not mess up QoS of various services) can
Jacob Appelbaum wrote
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:59:55 +:
| Hello from Iceland,
Hello from a strikestrucken KeflavĂkurflugvöllur,
| We came up with two main ideas for making this happen.
Thanks for the writeup.
| Another method would be to write a controller that watches for BGP network
| updat
Hello,
This seems to me like a really neat idea!
Reading from real time BGP feeds is not a simple task and I think it
might be a bit of an overhead for the average Tor user.
On the other hand it could be a good idea to have some nodes run tools
to generate exit policies or at least provide BGP r
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:11:58PM -0400, Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote:
> Hi All
> I read in the Tor design spec that Tor control protocol supports keepalive
> messages which could be used for link padding . I wonder if anyone has ever
> explored using them...
I don't think you mean the Tor control
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> > Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> >
> >> > We would also need a way for users to easily change the hashed
> >> > password. I can't remember if this is
Hello from Iceland,
Linus invited me to Reykjavik to talk about Tor at the NORDUnet conference
and this idea is the result of a bit of feedback from some network operators
here.
Tor needs a way to be friendly to large network operators who wish to enable
exiting to anonymous communication for the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:36:45 -0700
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
>> > We would also need a way for users to easily change the hashed
>> > password. I can't remember if this is a feature that is already
>> > present in Vidalia.
>> Yes, we do need
20 matches
Mail list logo
