Re: [tor-dev] The Torouter project - where are we now?

2011-04-24 Thread Daniel Bryg
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:36 PM, wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:15:17PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 7.4K > bytes in 195 lines about: > : My mistake. I thought someone had a bridge running and that the only > : problem was disk space. I'll see if I can set up my router as a bridge >

Re: [tor-dev] The Torouter project - where are we now?

2011-04-24 Thread Daniel Bryg
Sorry for jumping in late, see my comments below. On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > On 04/19/2011 03:17 AM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote: >> The Torouter project has a total of four bugs in Trac. These are >> #2334, #2376, #2370 and #2596. >> >> #2334: Torouter on Buffalo breaks

Re: [tor-dev] The Torouter project - where are we now?

2011-04-24 Thread andrew
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 07:15:17PM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 7.4K bytes in 195 lines about: : My mistake. I thought someone had a bridge running and that the only : problem was disk space. I'll see if I can set up my router as a bridge : this weekend and get things working. I did, on th

Re: [tor-dev] The Torouter project - where are we now?

2011-04-24 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
On 04/24/2011 01:14 AM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: >> On 04/23/2011 04:32 PM, Erinn Clark wrote: >>> * Jacob Appelbaum [2011:04:21 11:54 -0700]: It's a question for what we as a project can handle supporting - when a new Tor is relea

Re: [tor-dev] The Torouter project - where are we now?

2011-04-24 Thread Runa A. Sandvik
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > On 04/23/2011 04:32 PM, Erinn Clark wrote: >> * Jacob Appelbaum [2011:04:21 11:54 -0700]: >>> It's a question for what we as a project can handle supporting - when a >>> new Tor is released, we'll need to build it unless we rely on upstrea