[tor-dev] Proposal idea: Require majority of authorities to vote for consensus parameters

2011-02-21 Thread Sebastian Hahn
Filename: xxx-param-voting.txt Title: Require majority of authorities to vote for consensus parameters Author: Sebastian Hahn Created: 16-Feb-2011 Status: Draft Overview: The consensus that the directory authorities create may contain one or more parameters (32-bit signed integers) that influen

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Chris Palmer
On Feb 21, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Adam Langley wrote: > I agree that forcing collateral damage is the key here. The current > code generates `random' certificates, but it's pretty easy to pattern > match them and there's no collateral damage to doing so. The thing that seems most correct to me, and m

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Langley
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Tim Wilde wrote: > Any static list is going to, by definition, have to exist within the > source code, and thus will be very easy for an even moderately > determined censor to find.  If we're going to do that we had better be > doing it with something that we know

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Tim Wilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/21/2011 1:54 PM, Adam Langley wrote: > "Internet Widgits Pty Ltd" is the OpenSSL default. "Hewlett-Packard > Co." are JetDirect printers. "Fortinet Ltd." is some gateway > manufacturer. > > Tor doesn't have to pick a single type I believe. It cou

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Langley
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > Aha.  Let's see if I have the tor-dev address right at long long last. >  Apologies to Peter, who will have received more than one copy of this > already. I did a quick scan of a subset of the EFF Observatory data (where `subset' is defined

Re: [tor-dev] xxx-draft-spec-for-TLS-normalization.txt

2011-02-21 Thread Nick Mathewson
Aha. Let's see if I have the tor-dev address right at long long last. Apologies to Peter, who will have received more than one copy of this already. (Apparently , I am told, the "lists." in tor-dev@lists.torproject.org is not optional.) On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: >

[tor-dev] SSL Observatory Observations

2011-02-21 Thread Tim Wilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 G'morning all! Last weekend's hackfest inspired me to attempt to run some numbers on the EFF SSL Observatory data[1], in particular looking at two things: the commonality of the "Internet Widgits Pty" organization string (a default in OpenSSL's CSR ge