Re: wcwidth() fix in libform

2011-04-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:41:47PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Again so it is a cchar_t so I'm not sure it is valid for it to be > nonprintable but this doesn't do any harm. > > Might want to run this stuff past upstream first though? It is better if > we stay in sync if they do want to take

Re: wcwidth() fix in libform

2011-04-03 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Again so it is a cchar_t so I'm not sure it is valid for it to be nonprintable but this doesn't do any harm. Might want to run this stuff past upstream first though? It is better if we stay in sync if they do want to take it. On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:51:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Som

wcwidth() fix in libform

2011-04-03 Thread Stefan Sperling
Some callers of myWCWIDTH(), a macro alias for cell_width(), won't cope with -1. Index: frm_driver.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libform/frm_driver.c,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.10 frm_driver.c --- frm_driver.c18