On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:41:00 +
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/12/10 12:18, Brynet wrote:
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Here's an attempt to fix a potential MCLGETI issue with vr(4) similar
> > > to what I recently fixed fro re(4). Unfortunately I don't have any
> > > vr(4) hardware mysel
On 2010/12/10 12:18, Brynet wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Here's an attempt to fix a potential MCLGETI issue with vr(4) similar
> > to what I recently fixed fro re(4). Unfortunately I don't have any
> > vr(4) hardware myself, so I need some hep testing this.
> >
> > Things to look for are:
>
Since you're wondering, here's my mail to Mark ...
(I've used vr(4) on my router for some time and installed another one
on another system and I've never had any problems, though the traffic
has been minimal).
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:18:03 -0500
Brynet wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Here's
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Here's an attempt to fix a potential MCLGETI issue with vr(4) similar
> to what I recently fixed fro re(4). Unfortunately I don't have any
> vr(4) hardware myself, so I need some hep testing this.
>
> Things to look for are:
>
> 1. Does this diff have any effect on through
Here's an attempt to fix a potential MCLGETI issue with vr(4) similar
to what I recently fixed fro re(4). Unfortunately I don't have any
vr(4) hardware myself, so I need some hep testing this.
Things to look for are:
1. Does this diff have any effect on throughput (packets/s, bits/s).
2. Does t
