On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:48:23PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:31AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > I already gave my OK for relayd but asked to adjust all proc.c instances.
>
> I have fixed relayd, httpd, vmd.
> akoshibe@ cares about switchd.
switchd is also now
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:31AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> I already gave my OK for relayd but asked to adjust all proc.c instances.
I have fixed relayd, httpd, vmd.
akoshibe@ cares about switchd.
Could someone who uses snmpd apply the fix and test it?
lpd/proc.c looks differently and seems
Hi,
I already gave my OK for relayd but asked to adjust all proc.c instances.
OK reyk@
> Am 09.09.2018 um 23:47 schrieb Mike Larkin :
>
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:45:07PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Like the other proc.c daemons, vmd(8) children do not detach from
>> the term
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:45:07PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Like the other proc.c daemons, vmd(8) children do not detach from
> the terminal properly.
>
> ok?
>
Reads ok to me but reyk@ should approve.
> bluhm
>
> Index: src/usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c
> ===
Hi,
Like the other proc.c daemons, vmd(8) children do not detach from
the terminal properly.
ok?
bluhm
Index: src/usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/usr.sbin/vmd/proc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u