On Sunday, February 26th, 2023 at 12:11 PM, Mike Larkin
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 07:05:12PM +, not jacinda ardern wrote:
>
> > I poked around on the web a bit, but didn't seem to find an answer
> > anywhere. Have any of you had any luck with the m1 or m2 arm64 chips from
> > the fr
femto-hypervisor?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Mike Larkin wrote:
>> > Is this hypervisor more similar to "micro"-hypervisor or to monolithic
>> > hypervisor?
>> >
>>
>> I don't know what those terms mean.
>
> It's a milli-hypervisor!
>
Mike Larkin wrote:
> > Is this hypervisor more similar to "micro"-hypervisor or to monolithic
> > hypervisor?
> >
>
> I don't know what those terms mean.
It's a milli-hypervisor!
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Lampshade wrote:
> Sorry for newbie question, but I am curious
> and this hipervisor is new thing so there is no man pages yet.
>
It's not yet in the tree.
> I have read general classification of hypervisors on Wikipedia
> and there are types: Type-1 an
Sorry for newbie question, but I am curious
and this hipervisor is new thing so there is no man pages yet.
I have read general classification of hypervisors on Wikipedia
and there are types: Type-1 and Type-2.
I have also read about KVM on cern.ch's Wiki.
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Vir
> TL;DR - a native hypervisor is coming. stay tuned.
>
Good job !
Getting rid of systemdOS by 5.9 would be a blast :D
t (namely
i386 support, shadow paging, nested virtualization, support for legacy
peripherals, etc) and trying to backfit support for those things into
another hypervisor would probably have been just as hard as building
it from the ground up.
The inevitable questions:
Q. What OSes can I run?
A. To start,
