On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 05:31:04PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> I don't think this is the right way to do this. The consumer of rtinfo
> need to check the values based on their needs. Ideally we add some helpers
> to make that easier. I think it is close to impossible to properly
> validate the so
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The kernel may crash as there is not enough input validation in
> routing messages.
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=e2076a6518b49730aefe64acf0a266f8e79685a5
>
> Here the name of a routing label is not NUL termina
Hi,
The kernel may crash as there is not enough input validation in
routing messages.
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=e2076a6518b49730aefe64acf0a266f8e79685a5
Here the name of a routing label is not NUL terminated, but there
are more things that can go wrong. So I added some checks for
inc
