On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:08:46PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below rewrites uvm_fault() using a loop.
>
> I added a KERNEL_LOCK/UNLOCK() dance around the part that won't be
> unlocked soon to illustrate where this is going.
>
> ok?
I'm also ok with this.
Total bikesheed, but I would
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:08:46PM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below rewrites uvm_fault() using a loop.
>
> I added a KERNEL_LOCK/UNLOCK() dance around the part that won't be
> unlocked soon to illustrate where this is going.
>
> ok?
yes, ok jmatthew@
>
> Index: uvm/uvm_fault.c
>
Diff below rewrites uvm_fault() using a loop.
I added a KERNEL_LOCK/UNLOCK() dance around the part that won't be
unlocked soon to illustrate where this is going.
ok?
Index: uvm/uvm_fault.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_fault.c,