Re: uthum(4) diff to test

2020-01-04 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 04/01/20(Sat) 16:30, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 16:15:22 +0100 > > From: Martin Pieuchot > > > > `delay' is expressed in ms, however since tsleep_nsec(9) doesn't add a > > tick the conversions below might result in shorter sleeps. I'd > > appreciate if uthum(4) owners coul

Re: uthum(4) diff to test

2020-01-04 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 16:15:22 +0100 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > `delay' is expressed in ms, however since tsleep_nsec(9) doesn't add a > tick the conversions below might result in shorter sleeps. I'd > appreciate if uthum(4) owners could test this diff and report back. I'm not sure I underst

uthum(4) diff to test

2020-01-04 Thread Martin Pieuchot
`delay' is expressed in ms, however since tsleep_nsec(9) doesn't add a tick the conversions below might result in shorter sleeps. I'd appreciate if uthum(4) owners could test this diff and report back. Index: uthum.c === RCS file: /c