Re: usermod.8 patch

2017-03-31 Thread Philipp Buehler
Am 31.03.2017 15:39 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: I think the current wording is fine; no need for an option to set _default_ values. options are good - as long as they're optional --art -- pb

Re: usermod.8 patch

2017-03-31 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 31, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Matthew Martin wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 08:03:44AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: >> usermod(8) doesn't have an option for setting defaults. Here is a patch to >> correct the manual. > > I believe it's referring to user.c read_defa

Re: usermod.8 patch

2017-03-31 Thread Matthew Martin
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 08:03:44AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > usermod(8) doesn't have an option for setting defaults. Here is a patch to > correct the manual. I believe it's referring to user.c read_defaults which calls setdefaults before reading the defaults.

Re: usermod.8 patch

2017-03-31 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Edgar Pettijohn writes: > usermod(8) doesn't have an option for setting defaults. Here is a patch > to correct the manual. I think the current wording is fine; no need for an option to set _default_ values. > Index: usermod.8 > ==

usermod.8 patch

2017-03-31 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
usermod(8) doesn't have an option for setting defaults. Here is a patch to correct the manual. Index: usermod.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/user/usermod.8,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -p -u -r1.35 usermod.8 --- usermod.8