Re: use libtls in ldapd

2016-04-24 Thread Bob Beck
just go for it. see who screams ok beck@ On Sunday, 24 April 2016, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Jonathan Matthew(jonat...@d14n.org ) on 2016.04.18 07:17:55 > +1000: > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 04:36:15PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > > > A while back (s2k15?), reyk@ suggested I take a look at

Re: use libtls in ldapd

2016-04-24 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Jonathan Matthew(jonat...@d14n.org) on 2016.04.18 07:17:55 +1000: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 04:36:15PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > > A while back (s2k15?), reyk@ suggested I take a look at converting ldapd to > > use > > libtls rather than the openssl api. Today I finally got around to it, >

Re: use libtls in ldapd

2016-04-17 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 04:36:15PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > A while back (s2k15?), reyk@ suggested I take a look at converting ldapd to > use > libtls rather than the openssl api. Today I finally got around to it, > resulting in the diff below. Most of the diff just removes ssl.c and > s

use libtls in ldapd

2016-04-09 Thread Jonathan Matthew
A while back (s2k15?), reyk@ suggested I take a look at converting ldapd to use libtls rather than the openssl api. Today I finally got around to it, resulting in the diff below. Most of the diff just removes ssl.c and ssl_privsep.c, and replaces some of it with evbuffer_tls.c (copied from syslog