On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:30:21AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > may just a naive question..
> > > but did you sudo vipw
> > > and put unbound class for unbound user?
> >
> > That's not neccesary anymore these days, I believe. The rc.d subsystem
> > takes case of setting the proper class,
> > may just a naive question..
> > but did you sudo vipw
> > and put unbound class for unbound user?
>
> That's not neccesary anymore these days, I believe. The rc.d subsystem
> takes case of setting the proper class, if available. At least it
That's correct.
> does not document setting the l
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:04:52AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> may just a naive question..
> but did you sudo vipw
> and put unbound class for unbound user?
That's not neccesary anymore these days, I believe. The rc.d subsystem
takes case of setting the proper class, if available. At least it
d
may just a naive question..
but did you sudo vipw
and put unbound class for unbound user?
/Bogdan
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:46 AM, Otto Moerbeek
wrote:
Hi,
So i have started using unbound on a mailserver (running amd64 5.6-stable).
First observation is that it uses (too?)
Hi,
So i have started using unbound on a mailserver (running amd64 5.6-stable).
First observation is that it uses (too?) many file descriptors in the
default setup.
Dec 15 22:38:00 mx1 unbound: [8713:0] error: can't create socket: Too many open
files
Dec 15 22:38:00 mx1 last message repeated
