On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:12:01PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/12/19(Thu) 11:57, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:38:34PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >
> > > ok?
> >
> > I'm no kernel hacker but I really do not see the point.
>
> Most of the kernel doesn't use a
On 05/12/19(Thu) 11:57, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:38:34PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> > ok?
>
> I'm no kernel hacker but I really do not see the point.
Most of the kernel doesn't use any type for boolean. The exception is
UVM which uses its own boolean_t. This typ
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:38:34PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> ok?
I'm no kernel hacker but I really do not see the point.
boolean_t helps to see if a functions is supposed to return a boolean
instead of an error code. I hate reading a function and having to
guess if 0 is supposed to mean su
ok?
Index: i386/pmap.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/pmap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.204
diff -u -p -r1.204 pmap.c
--- i386/pmap.c 18 Jan 2019 01:34:50 - 1.204
+++ i386/pmap.c 5 Dec 2019 11:23:20 -
@@ -403,7 +4
