On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:39:41AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> David Gwynne wrote:
> > i recently proposed replacing a hash with an rb tree somewhere in
> > the network stack, but it was pointed out that rb trees are big.
> >
> > in hindsight i think the other person was talking about the size
> >
David Gwynne wrote:
> i recently proposed replacing a hash with an rb tree somewhere in
> the network stack, but it was pointed out that rb trees are big.
>
> in hindsight i think the other person was talking about the size
> of an RB_ENTRY inside each thing you're tracking, but it made me
> look
this updates the diff after the SLIST changes in uvm.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:19:20AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> i recently proposed replacing a hash with an rb tree somewhere in
> the network stack, but it was pointed out that rb trees are big.
>
> in hindsight i think the other person was
