> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:39:37 -0600
> From: Scott Cheloha
>
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:21:14PM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
> >
> > My x1 gen 2 seems to have a TPM 1.2 chip. Or can emulate one?
> > The bios is confusing. I had it disabled until now.
>
oha
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:26:27PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > > Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:16:27 -0600
> > > > > > From: Scott Cheloha
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On W
Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:16:27 -0600
> > > > > From: Scott Cheloha
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > > > As mentioned in a prior mail,
gt; From: Scott Cheloha
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > > As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
> > > > > the tree.
> > > > >
> >
-0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
> > > > the tree.
> > > >
> > > > However, we don't need to use tvtohz(9) in tpm(4) at all. Converting
> > > > from milliseconds
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:26:27PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:16:27 -0600
> > From: Scott Cheloha
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last us
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:16:27 -0600
> From: Scott Cheloha
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
> > the tree.
> >
> > However, we don't need to us
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
> the tree.
>
> However, we don't need to use tvtohz(9) in tpm(4) at all. Converting
> from milliseconds to ticks is trivial. Using an inter
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:16:13PM -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
> the tree.
>
> However, we don't need to use tvtohz(9) in tpm(4) at all. Converting
> from milliseconds to ticks is trivial. Using an inter
As mentioned in a prior mail, tpm(4) is the last user of tvtohz(9) in
the tree.
However, we don't need to use tvtohz(9) in tpm(4) at all. Converting
from milliseconds to ticks is trivial. Using an intermediary timeval
is just pointless indirection.
With this committed I will be able to r
> On Dec 18, 2020, at 20:16, joshua stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:58:43 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> tpm(4) is the last driver in the tree using tvtohz(9). There are no
>> remaining callers using tstohz(9), so if and when we remov
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:58:43 -0600, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tpm(4) is the last driver in the tree using tvtohz(9). There are no
> remaining callers using tstohz(9), so if and when we remove tvtohz(9)
> from tpm(4) we can remove both interfaces from the tree.
>
Hi,
tpm(4) is the last driver in the tree using tvtohz(9). There are no
remaining callers using tstohz(9), so if and when we remove tvtohz(9)
from tpm(4) we can remove both interfaces from the tree.
tpm(4) is tricky because it converts timeouts from milliseconds to
ticks and then doesn'
your diagnosis!
-ml
> Mon Mar 11 23:47:54 GMT 2019 Mike Larkin :
>
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:24:42AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was looking at the manual page for tpm(4) and noticed that it has
> > > something to to w
un Arch Linux on their X1 5gs and have no problem suspending.
Cheers!
Edd Barrett
Mon Mar 11 23:47:54 GMT 2019 Mike Larkin :
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:24:42AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was looking at the manual page for tpm(4) and noticed that
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:24:42AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the manual page for tpm(4) and noticed that it has
> something to to with suspend/resume:
>
> > Functionality is limited to instructing the device to save its
> > st
Hi,
I was looking at the manual page for tpm(4) and noticed that it has
something to to with suspend/resume:
> Functionality is limited to instructing the device to save its
> state before a system suspend.
The X1 5th generation has a MSFT0101 TPM chip which we don't y
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:21:33 -0500
> From: joshua stein
>
> Newer machines with TPM chips can have trouble suspending or
> resuming, because the TPM chip is not instructed to save its state
> properly before suspend. On ThinkPads this can prevent suspend from
> working,
18 matches
Mail list logo
