On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 05:44:49PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> * There wasn't yet a list of possible errors for tmpfs in mount(2).
>That said, I question the value of maintaining these lists. It's
>almost impossible for them to be comprehensive - for example, some
>*_mount() fun
* EINVAL is returned in a case where there is insufficient memory.
ENOMEM makes more sense. This one is ok natano@.
* There wasn't yet a list of possible errors for tmpfs in mount(2).
That said, I question the value of maintaining these lists. It's
almost impossible for them to be compr
