Re: tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Bob Beck
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016, Bob Beck wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 20 July 2016, Henning Brauer > wrote: > >> * Sebastian Benoit [2016-07-20 21:42]: >> > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2016.07.20 19:08:51 +0200: >> > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: >> >

Re: tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Bob Beck
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Sebastian Benoit > [2016-07-20 21:42]: > > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com ) on 2016.07.20 > 19:08:51 +0200: > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > > For testing I want to abuse tcpbench to work over

Re: tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Henning Brauer
* Sebastian Benoit [2016-07-20 21:42]: > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2016.07.20 19:08:51 +0200: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > For testing I want to abuse tcpbench to work over AF_UNIX sockets. > > > This diff does exactly that with minimal

Re: tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2016.07.20 19:08:51 +0200: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > For testing I want to abuse tcpbench to work over AF_UNIX sockets. > > This diff does exactly that with minimal extras. Especially the unix > > socket is not re

Re: tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > For testing I want to abuse tcpbench to work over AF_UNIX sockets. > This diff does exactly that with minimal extras. Especially the unix > socket is not removed from the filesystem when closed. I don't want to > add pledge cpath to t

Re: tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Markus Friedl
schaut gut aus, hab aber nicht probiert. 2016-07-20 16:09 GMT+02:00 Claudio Jeker : > For testing I want to abuse tcpbench to work over AF_UNIX sockets. > This diff does exactly that with minimal extras. Especially the unix > socket is not removed from the filesystem when closed. I don't want to >

tcpbench(4) support for AF_UNIX

2016-07-20 Thread Claudio Jeker
For testing I want to abuse tcpbench to work over AF_UNIX sockets. This diff does exactly that with minimal extras. Especially the unix socket is not removed from the filesystem when closed. I don't want to add pledge cpath to tcpbench just for that. -- :wq Claudio Index: tcpbench.1