Re: tcp timer delack

2018-05-08 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 08/05/18(Tue) 15:26, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 08/05/18(Tue) 14:32, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > @@ -176,12 +176,12 @@ do { \ > > > struct ifnet *ifp = NULL; \ > > > if (m && (m->m_flags & M_PKTHDR)) \ > > > ifp

Re: tcp timer delack

2018-05-08 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:04:59PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 08/05/18(Tue) 14:32, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > @@ -176,12 +176,12 @@ do { \ > > struct ifnet *ifp = NULL; \ > > if (m && (m->m_flags & M_PKTHDR)) \ > > ifp = if_get(m->m_pkthdr.ph_ifidx); \ > > - if ((tp)->

Re: tcp timer delack

2018-05-08 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 08/05/18(Tue) 14:32, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Hi, > > Historically there were slow and fast tcp timeouts. That is why > the delack timer has a different implementation. > > Let's use the same macros for all TCP timer. > > Index: netinet/tcp_input.c > =

tcp timer delack

2018-05-08 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, Historically there were slow and fast tcp timeouts. That is why the delack timer has a different implementation. Let's use the same macros for all TCP timer. ok? bluhm Index: netinet/tcp_input.c === RCS file: /data/mirror/ope