> On 11 Sep 2021, at 21:51, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 04:05:31AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After converting syslogd messages to iov, UDP can use sendmsg(2)
>>> instead of snprintf()
> On 11 Sep 2021, at 21:16, Martijn van Duren
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2021-09-11 at 04:05 +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After converting syslogd messages to iov, UDP can use sendmsg(2)
>>> instead of snprintf(
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 04:05:31AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After converting syslogd messages to iov, UDP can use sendmsg(2)
> > instead of snprintf().
> >
> > ok?
> >
>
> I have one question below, but th
On Sat, 2021-09-11 at 04:05 +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After converting syslogd messages to iov, UDP can use sendmsg(2)
> > instead of snprintf().
> >
> > ok?
> >
>
> I have one question below, but the diff
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 07:40:58PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After converting syslogd messages to iov, UDP can use sendmsg(2)
> instead of snprintf().
>
> ok?
>
I have one question below, but the diff is ok by mvs@ if it is not
significant.
It is expected we could drop iov[6].iov
Hi,
After converting syslogd messages to iov, UDP can use sendmsg(2)
instead of snprintf().
ok?
bluhm
Index: usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.269
diff -u -p -r1.26
