Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Ricardo Mestre
> wrote:
> > I made an inspection on userland tree and there quite a few applications
> > still
> > using strncpy(3) instead of strlcpy(3). Some of them may never need that
> > safety
> > since the boundaries are always fi
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> I made an inspection on userland tree and there quite a few applications still
> using strncpy(3) instead of strlcpy(3). Some of them may never need that
> safety
> since the boundaries are always fixed, nevertheless since strlcpy is a drop
Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> I made an inspection on userland tree and there quite a few
> applications still using strncpy(3) instead of strlcpy(3). Some of
> them may never need that safety since the boundaries are always fixed,
> nevertheless since strlcpy is a drop-in replacement it doesn't hurt to
Hello,
I made an inspection on userland tree and there quite a few applications still
using strncpy(3) instead of strlcpy(3). Some of them may never need that safety
since the boundaries are always fixed, nevertheless since strlcpy is a drop-in
replacement it doesn't hurt to use, plus it will alwa
