On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:14 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
> is there a reason why this check should be done twice?
>
If the code is inextricable, check the history of how it got that way. In
this case, there was a mostly mechanical elimination of unnecessary
__BSD_VISIBLE clauses which changed di
is there a reason why this check should be done twice?
/usr/include/string.h:117:
#if __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 200809
char*stpcpy(char *__restrict, const char *__restrict);
char*stpncpy(char *__restrict, const char *__restrict, size_t);
char*strndup(const char *, size_t);
size_t strnlen(c
