Hello Ali,
On 25/2/22 17:22, Ali Farzanrad wrote:
"Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" wrote:
char dest[SIZE];
char *end;
end = &dest[SIZE - 1];
stpecpy(dest, "Hello world", end);
Perfect way to introduce new hidden backdoors!
Just use realloc `des
"Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" wrote:
>char dest[SIZE];
>char *end;
>
>end = &dest[SIZE - 1];
>stpecpy(dest, "Hello world", end);
Perfect way to introduce new hidden backdoors!
Just use realloc `dest' to a new value, but forget to update `end'
pro
Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> However, considering some systems don't have strl* functions, and
> explicitly don't want to add them (glibc rejected strl* functions),
> there it might be useful to add this function.
So your position is that when a small number of people fight the
emergen
Hi Theo,
On 2/13/22 23:45, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Your proposal isn't an improvement over the current situation with strl*
> functions, and I don't think this is helpful.
>
> Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>>Compared to other string copy and concatenation functions
>>strlcat(3BS
Your proposal isn't an improvement over the current situation with strl*
functions, and I don't think this is helpful.
Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi, Todd and Theo!
>
> I wrote this function this week, based on strlcpy(3) and strecopy()[1],
> which are the best string copy functions
Hi, Todd and Theo!
I wrote this function this week, based on strlcpy(3) and strecopy()[1],
which are the best string copy functions I've seen so far. But I came
to improvements that bring one function that I think is better than both
of those.
I posted the function for review on codidact.com[2].
