Anyone? I have received no feedback on this.
I'd really like to get review because fixing IPv6CP has
turned out to be tricker than I expected.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:32:03PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Our IPv6CP implementation has never handled IFID collisions. The old
> code (from befor
Our IPv6CP implementation has never handled IFID collisions. The old
code (from before r1.112 of if_spppsubr.c) punted and left the address
unchanged. The new code (as of r1.112) is supposed to handle collisions,
but instead goes into an endless conf-nak loop with the peer.
The problem is that I m
