Gilles Chehade (2019-11-25 08:43 +0100):
> and this diff makes smtpd warn at startup that implicit rules were used:
>
> laptop$ doas smtpd
> smtpd: ruleset relies on implicit 'from' at line 10
> smtpd: ruleset relies on implicit 'for' at line 11
> laptop$
Without context it may not be obvious wha
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:30:21AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 01:09:20AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:54:14AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > >
> > > Ten years ago, it seemed a very neat idea that OpenSMTPD would have some
> > > implicit defa
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 01:09:20AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:54:14AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > Ten years ago, it seemed a very neat idea that OpenSMTPD would have some
> > implicit defaults to avoid people creating open relays.
> >
> > Back then I was trying
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:54:14AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> Ten years ago, it seemed a very neat idea that OpenSMTPD would have some
> implicit defaults to avoid people creating open relays.
>
> Back then I was trying to make the smtpd.conf as compact as possible and
> came up with the ve
> Hello,
Hi Gilles,
> Is there strong objection to move to a mode where implicit notation will
> no longer be allowed ?
I think that's a good idea regarding the growing of matching facilities
in smtpd, as long as we make sure the removal of implicit "from local"
doesn't turn somehow into an impl
On 10:54 Sun 24 Nov, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ten years ago, it seemed a very neat idea that OpenSMTPD would have some
> implicit defaults to avoid people creating open relays.
>
> Back then I was trying to make the smtpd.conf as compact as possible and
> came up with the very nice idea
Hello,
Ten years ago, it seemed a very neat idea that OpenSMTPD would have some
implicit defaults to avoid people creating open relays.
Back then I was trying to make the smtpd.conf as compact as possible and
came up with the very nice idea of "implicit local" so that we would get
a very compact:
