Re: smtpd filters: prettify proc-exec

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 07:33:29PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > On 8/23/19 7:06 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:03:51AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > > > > Hello, > > > > > >> When running processes with proc-exec any logging send over stderr is

Re: smtpd filters: prettify proc-exec

On 8/23/19 7:06 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:03:51AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: >> Hello, >> > > Hello, > > >> When running processes with proc-exec any logging send over stderr is >> not very intelligible since the process name is automatically generated >> and

Re: smtpd filters: prettify proc-exec

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:03:51AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > Hello, > Hello, > When running processes with proc-exec any logging send over stderr is > not very intelligible since the process name is automatically generated > and results in , which make them hard to read. > Agreed

smtpd filters: prettify proc-exec

Hello, When running processes with proc-exec any logging send over stderr is not very intelligible since the process name is automatically generated and results in , which make them hard to read. To clean this up I reckon we can do three things: 1) Add an extra optional proc parameter that sets