I took another look at this and it seems correct to me. We should
not really be using tx->evp.rcpt after the it has been added to the
tx->rcpts list.
I plan to commit it unless there are objections.
- todd
Ping.
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 08:01:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Bit focused on other things atm and not familiar with this part of the
> code, but some comments.
>
> On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 12:18 -0600, Chris Waddey wrote:
>> A message with a single successful recipient but with a faile
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 08:01:01AM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Bit focused on other things atm and not familiar with this part of the
> code, but some comments.
>
> On Sat, 2022-10-08 at 12:18 -0600, Chris Waddey wrote:
>> A message with a single successful recipient but with a failed
>> rc
A message with a single successful recipient but with a failed
rcpt to: command afterward generates an incorrect Received: header.
The following produces the bug:
thief$ nc localhost 25
220 thief.private ESMTP OpenSMTPD
ehlo thief.private^M
250-thief.private Hello thief.private [127.0.0.1], pleas
