On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:48:56 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Neither of these are really ideal, and mean that we still need gseq
> for integers >= 1,000,000
>
> $ seq 99 99
> 99
> $ seq 100 100
> 1e+06
>
> $ gseq 105 105
> 105
That probably requires a separate cod
On 2023/06/12 11:20, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> We need to compare the printable version of the last value displayed,
> not the floating point representation. Otherwise, we may print the
> last value twice.
>
> Old:
>
> $ seq 105 105
> 1.05e+06
> 1.05e+06
>
> New:
>
> $ se
For context, see:
https://chaos.social/@Gottox/110527807405964874
https://github.com/chimera-linux/chimerautils/commit/1ecc1e99d4a309631e846a868b5a422f996704ac
We need to compare the printable version of the last value displayed,
not the floating point representation. Otherwise, we may print the
last value twice.
Old:
$ seq 105 105
1.05e+06
1.05e+06
New:
$ seq 105 105
1.05e+06
We really need seq regression tests.
