Re: run-regress-* targets in bsd.regress.mk

2022-12-02 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:08:33PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 01:52:43PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > I wanted to override some of the default run-regress-* targets by > > > declaring them in regress Makef

Re: run-regress-* targets in bsd.regress.mk

2022-12-02 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 01:52:43PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > I wanted to override some of the default run-regress-* targets by > > declaring them in regress Makefiles. Many tests already do that and > > it happens to work as expecte

Re: run-regress-* targets in bsd.regress.mk

2022-12-02 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > I wanted to override some of the default run-regress-* targets by > declaring them in regress Makefiles. Many tests already do that and > it happens to work as expected. > > However, this relies on behavior in the BUGS section of make

run-regress-* targets in bsd.regress.mk

2022-12-02 Thread Theo Buehler
I wanted to override some of the default run-regress-* targets by declaring them in regress Makefiles. Many tests already do that and it happens to work as expected. However, this relies on behavior in the BUGS section of make. In fact, espie informs me that gmake behaves the other way around and