Re: rthreads vs pthreads performance test

2010-04-16 Thread Jung
yeap. mysql compiled with libpthread.so.10.0(maybe 4.5 version) so. i did recompiled and just move libpthread.so.x.y -> librthread.so.x.y here result. (super-smack error and sysbench slow performance. hackbench error) * super-smack # ./super-smack -d mysql select-key.smack 10 100 Query Barrel Re

Re: rthreads vs pthreads performance test

2010-04-16 Thread Chris Cappuccio
You don't need to recompile mysql or other tools. Just move the librthreads shared object library (librthreads.so.x.y) in place of libpthreads.so.x.y. It's designed to work this way. Jung [moor...@gmail.com] wrote: > oops. > sorry. i did not re-compile mysql and other tool. (pthreads vs > rthr

Re: rthreads vs pthreads performance test

2010-04-13 Thread Jung
te: >> rthreads vs pthreads performance test >> >> at today, i did test recent rthreads performance. >> previous e-mail http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=120634514721997 >> rthreads performance was poor. but recent rthreads performance good like below. >>

Re: rthreads vs pthreads performance test

2010-04-13 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Jung wrote: > rthreads vs pthreads performance test > > at today, i did test recent rthreads performance. > previous e-mail http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=120634514721997 > rthreads performance was poor. but recent rthreads performance

rthreads vs pthreads performance test

2010-04-13 Thread Jung
rthreads vs pthreads performance test at today, i did test recent rthreads performance. previous e-mail http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=120634514721997 rthreads performance was poor. but recent rthreads performance good like below. some test result on Core 2 Duo + 4.7-Current(GENERI