On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:19:43PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:05:49PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> > On Friday 22 March 2013 4:08:47 pm James Turner wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:01:42PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > I stalled on submitting t
On Friday 22 March 2013 4:08:47 pm James Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:01:42PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 March 2013 7:47:34 am Brad Smith wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:43:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2013/03/21 12:32, Taylan Ulrich B. wrot
On 03/22/13 08:35, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/03/21 22:01, Kurt Miller wrote:
>> I stalled on submitting them with upstream. I ran into a snafu. However, I
>> do have an update for boehm-gc that can be tested. There's one i386
>> machine in my cluster that doesn't behave which is one of the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:01:42PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Thursday 21 March 2013 7:47:34 am Brad Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:43:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2013/03/21 12:32, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> > > > Stuart Henderson writes:
> > > >
> > > > > As I sa
On 2013/03/21 22:01, Kurt Miller wrote:
> I stalled on submitting them with upstream. I ran into a snafu. However, I
> do have an update for boehm-gc that can be tested. There's one i386
> machine in my cluster that doesn't behave which is one of the reasons
> I haven't moved this forward yet. It
Kurt Miller writes:
> I stalled on submitting them with upstream. I ran into a snafu. However, I
> do have an update for boehm-gc that can be tested. There's one i386
> machine in my cluster that doesn't behave which is one of the reasons
> I haven't moved this forward yet. It is on my todo list
Ted Unangst writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:03, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
>> I'm a GNU Guile 2.0 user, whose latest versions require latest
>> versions of the Boehm garbage collector. This uses the functions
>> pthread_suspend_np and pthread_resume_np, when built on OpenBSD, which
>> don't exi
On Thursday 21 March 2013 7:47:34 am Brad Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:43:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/03/21 12:32, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> > > Stuart Henderson writes:
> > >
> > > > As I said, "perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have
> > > > in the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:03, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> I'm a GNU Guile 2.0 user, whose latest versions require latest
> versions of the Boehm garbage collector. This uses the functions
> pthread_suspend_np and pthread_resume_np, when built on OpenBSD, which
> don't exist in rthreads.
Right. Ear
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:43:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/03/21 12:32, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson writes:
> >
> > > As I said, "perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have
> > > in the port got committed upstream and now need to be reverted?"
> > >
> >
On 2013/03/21 12:32, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > As I said, "perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have
> > in the port got committed upstream and now need to be reverted?"
> >
> > i.e. _used_ to have, before the change to rthreads.
>
> Oh sorry, I und
Stuart Henderson writes:
> As I said, "perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have
> in the port got committed upstream and now need to be reverted?"
>
> i.e. _used_ to have, before the change to rthreads.
Oh sorry, I understand now. Indeed, the patches in e.g. 5.0 ports seem
equi
On 2013/03/21 11:51, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > the current boehm-gc port works with rthreads, best way forward is
> > probably to update that to a newer version, maintaining the patches that
> > we have.
> >
> > perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have i
Stuart Henderson writes:
> the current boehm-gc port works with rthreads, best way forward is
> probably to update that to a newer version, maintaining the patches that
> we have.
>
> perhaps the uthread workarounds that we used to have in the port got
> committed upstream and now need to be reve
On 2013/03/21 11:03, Taylan Ulrich B. wrote:
> I'm a GNU Guile 2.0 user, whose latest versions require latest
> versions of the Boehm garbage collector. This uses the functions
> pthread_suspend_np and pthread_resume_np, when built on OpenBSD, which
> don't exist in rthreads.
the current boehm-gc
I'm a GNU Guile 2.0 user, whose latest versions require latest
versions of the Boehm garbage collector. This uses the functions
pthread_suspend_np and pthread_resume_np, when built on OpenBSD, which
don't exist in rthreads.
I've read that rthreads are just processes, albeit with a special flag
se
16 matches
Mail list logo
