On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:20:45PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:16:17PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > This diff cleans up cert.c a bit.
> > >
> > > It removes the X509 handle from cert_parse() and ta_
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:20:45PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:16:17PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This diff cleans up cert.c a bit.
> >
> > It removes the X509 handle from cert_parse() and ta_parse(). Callers
> > should instead use cert->x509. No need to double the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 04:16:17PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff cleans up cert.c a bit.
>
> It removes the X509 handle from cert_parse() and ta_parse(). Callers
> should instead use cert->x509. No need to double the work on us here.
I never understood the point of this handle and I kno
This diff cleans up cert.c a bit.
It removes the X509 handle from cert_parse() and ta_parse(). Callers
should instead use cert->x509. No need to double the work on us here.
While there switch auth_insert() to a void function. This function can
not fail. Again the result is simpler code in parser.
