On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 03:30:33PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:48:01PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:21:03PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Ran into this the other day and could not help myself to adjust the code.
> > > If the mft is stale
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:48:01PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:21:03PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Ran into this the other day and could not help myself to adjust the code.
> > If the mft is stale just bump the stale counter and be done. If not stale
> > queue all fi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 01:21:03PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Ran into this the other day and could not help myself to adjust the code.
> If the mft is stale just bump the stale counter and be done. If not stale
> queue all files from the mft for the next round.
>
> In mft_parse I switched to a
Ran into this the other day and could not help myself to adjust the code.
If the mft is stale just bump the stale counter and be done. If not stale
queue all files from the mft for the next round.
In mft_parse I switched to a switch statement which is more obvious in my
opinion.
--
:wq Claudio
I
