On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 08:07:06PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > The filemode code is enough different from the regular parser code that it
> > makes sense to totally split it out. Only proc_parser_cert_validate() and
> > proc_parser
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 07:14:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The filemode code is enough different from the regular parser code that it
> makes sense to totally split it out. Only proc_parser_cert_validate() and
> proc_parser_root_cert() had to be duplicated which is IMO acceptable.
I'm not a
The filemode code is enough different from the regular parser code that it
makes sense to totally split it out. Only proc_parser_cert_validate() and
proc_parser_root_cert() had to be duplicated which is IMO acceptable.
The valid_x509() plus static functions are moved to validate.c.
The crl_tree co