Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:45:45AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I don't understand the point of any of this cleanup. The process
> > is dying and none of these things maintain external state.
> >
> > I'm going to call it what it is: stylistically stupid and rigid.
> >
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:45:45AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I don't understand the point of any of this cleanup. The process
> > is dying and none of these things maintain external state.
> >
> > I'm going to call it what it is: stylistically stupid and rigid.
> >
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:45:45AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I don't understand the point of any of this cleanup. The process
> is dying and none of these things maintain external state.
>
> I'm going to call it what it is: stylistically stupid and rigid.
>
> Why? Because it would mean ever
I don't understand the point of any of this cleanup. The process
is dying and none of these things maintain external state.
I'm going to call it what it is: stylistically stupid and rigid.
Why? Because it would mean every call to errx() in the program is
wrong because they don't attempt this, a
ERR_remove_state(0) is deprecated use the new api
ERR_remove_thread_state(NULL) instead.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: main.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -p -r1.61 main.c
--- main.c
