On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 08:50:57AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> yes makes sense
>
> ok beck@
agreed, ok claudio@
> > On May 11, 2022, at 07:53, Theo Buehler wrote:
> >
> > Some funky libcrypto business ahead.
> >
> > X509 API functions such as X509_check_ca() or X509_get_extension_flags()
> > c
yes makes sense
ok beck@
> On May 11, 2022, at 07:53, Theo Buehler wrote:
>
> Some funky libcrypto business ahead.
>
> X509 API functions such as X509_check_ca() or X509_get_extension_flags()
> cache X509v3 extensions internally if they're not already cached. They
> make decisions based on (o
Some funky libcrypto business ahead.
X509 API functions such as X509_check_ca() or X509_get_extension_flags()
cache X509v3 extensions internally if they're not already cached. They
make decisions based on (or report some of) the cached values. Although
it's unlikely, this caching may fail halfway
