On 19/02/18(Mon) 14:00, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.12 15:23:45 +0100:
> > On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
> >
> > Then why not c
Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.12 15:23:45 +0100:
> On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
>
> Then why not change the priority of the default route?
>
> > This might n
On 2018/02/12 15:23, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
>
> Then why not change the priority of the default route?
On a standard machine this is already
On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> routefilter currently filters the default route,
> if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
Then why not change the priority of the default route?
> This might not be a good idea - for example you might want to
> redistribute a default rou
routefilter currently filters the default route,
if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
This might not be a good idea - for example you might want to
redistribute a default route into ospf, for that you need it in the
routing table but it is configured with a low priority (high value) as
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 02:17:38AM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here is the ospfd part again, now the socket option is set on reload as
> well.
>
> ok?
>
> (benno_route_priofilter_2_ospfd.diff)
>
> diff --git usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c
> index 17febefbdcb..4f
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 02:14:32AM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2018.02.10 10:41:11 +:
> > This comment needs fixing or removing, otherwise ok.
> > Feel free to use this accompanying manpage diff.
>
> Hi sthen, thanks
>
> updated diff,this is only
Hi,
here is the ospfd part again, now the socket option is set on reload as
well.
ok?
(benno_route_priofilter_2_ospfd.diff)
diff --git usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c
index 17febefbdcb..4f6dc933a42 100644
--- usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c
+++ usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c
@@ -127,10 +127,1
Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2018.02.10 10:41:11 +:
> This comment needs fixing or removing, otherwise ok.
> Feel free to use this accompanying manpage diff.
Hi sthen, thanks
updated diff,this is only the kernel part + manpage.
I added the RTP constants to the manpage, as all the
On 2018/02/10 10:12, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
>
> - add ROUTE_PRIOFILTER
> - it has one argument that is interpreted as a route priority
> - all route updates with prio lower or equal will pass the filter,
> all with higher priority value will be filtered.
> - example use in ospfd
>
> comment
Nice feature
lots of real world use cases.
On 10 Feb 2018 9:19 AM, "Sebastian Benoit" wrote:
>
>
> - add ROUTE_PRIOFILTER
> - it has one argument that is interpreted as a route priority
> - all route updates with prio lower or equal will pass the filter,
> all with higher priority value will
- add ROUTE_PRIOFILTER
- it has one argument that is interpreted as a route priority
- all route updates with prio lower or equal will pass the filter,
all with higher priority value will be filtered.
- example use in ospfd
comments/oks?
(benno_ospfd_route_priofilter_1.diff)
diff --git sys/n
12 matches
Mail list logo
