> what do you want here, really? in my opinion, readers of section one
> pages should not be pointed to code. yes, yes, yes, other people
> disagree. but no one using sleep(1) will care.
>
> so you propose to remove the Xr to alarm(). that's a function mandated
> by posix. why make people less awa
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:45:26PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jan Klemkow wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:44:05PM +0100:
>
> > I've made a little diff to clean up some manpages with references to the
> > obsoleted functions usleep(1), alarm(3).
>
> Actually, i like this diff and woul
Hi,
Jan Klemkow wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:44:05PM +0100:
> I've made a little diff to clean up some manpages with references to the
> obsoleted functions usleep(1), alarm(3).
Actually, i like this diff and would like to commit it,
for the following reason: We include pointers in SEE ALSO
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:41:11 +0100
> From: Jan Klemkow
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:21:52AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:44:05PM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've made a little diff to clean up some manpages with references to the
> > > ob
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:21:52AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:44:05PM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've made a little diff to clean up some manpages with references to the
> > obsoleted functions usleep(1), alarm(3).
> >
> > bye,
> > Jan
> >
>
> stuff
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:44:05PM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've made a little diff to clean up some manpages with references to the
> obsoleted functions usleep(1), alarm(3).
>
> bye,
> Jan
>
stuff like alarm are still part of posix, as far as i know. not sure if
that should have an
Hi,
I've made a little diff to clean up some manpages with references to the
obsoleted functions usleep(1), alarm(3).
bye,
Jan
Index: bin/sleep/sleep.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/sleep/sleep.1,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -
