Hi Theo and Theo,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 08:06:32PM -0700:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
>> Theo Buehler wrote:
>>> According to our documentation and all the standards I checked,
>>> snprintf() returns a negative value on error, not necessarily -1.
>>> This confused me quite a bit
Ted Unangst wrote:
> Theo Buehler wrote:
> > According to our documentation and all the standards I checked,
> > snprintf() returns a negative value on error, not necessarily -1.
> > This confused me quite a bit recently so I suggest to adjust the
> > example code as follows:
>
> I don't know.
Theo Buehler wrote:
> According to our documentation and all the standards I checked,
> snprintf() returns a negative value on error, not necessarily -1.
> This confused me quite a bit recently so I suggest to adjust the
> example code as follows:
I don't know. I guess it's technially correct, bu
According to our documentation and all the standards I checked,
snprintf() returns a negative value on error, not necessarily -1.
This confused me quite a bit recently so I suggest to adjust the
example code as follows:
Index: lib/libc/stdio/printf.3
==
