On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 03:36:33PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:14:27AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 09:39:35AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This diff is based upon kshe's diff, but there's one differene: I am
> >
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:14:27AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 09:39:35AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This diff is based upon kshe's diff, but there's one differene: I am
> > using the __builtin_ffs instead of ffs(3). Looking at the assembly
> > genera
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 09:39:35AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This diff is based upon kshe's diff, but there's one differene: I am
> using the __builtin_ffs instead of ffs(3). Looking at the assembly
> generated by calling ffs(3) produces a function call, while the
> __builtin_ffs prod
Hi,
This diff is based upon kshe's diff, but there's one differene: I am
using the __builtin_ffs instead of ffs(3). Looking at the assembly
generated by calling ffs(3) produces a function call, while the
__builtin_ffs produces just a few machine instructions on all the
platforms I've checked. __bu
