> On 28 Aug 2022, at 20:48, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since we have no raw_usrreq anymore, we can retire pr_output.
> pfkeyv2 and route can call ther output functions directly.
>
> ok?
>
ok mvs@
> bluhm
>
> Index: net/pfkeyv2.c
>
Hi,
Since we have no raw_usrreq anymore, we can retire pr_output.
pfkeyv2 and route can call ther output functions directly.
ok?
bluhm
Index: net/pfkeyv2.c
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/net/pfkeyv2.c,v
retrieving r
On 9 May 2017 at 13:38, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Remove rip_output() and rip6_output() from inetsw and inet6sw. The
> rip_output() function is never called via the pr_output pointer.
> rip_usrreq(PRU_SEND) calls rip_output() directly. raw_usrreq() is
> never called from inetsw. Situati
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:38:07PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Remove rip_output() and rip6_output() from inetsw and inet6sw. The
> rip_output() function is never called via the pr_output pointer.
> rip_usrreq(PRU_SEND) calls rip_output() directly. raw_usrreq() is
> never called from
Hi,
Remove rip_output() and rip6_output() from inetsw and inet6sw. The
rip_output() function is never called via the pr_output pointer.
rip_usrreq(PRU_SEND) calls rip_output() directly. raw_usrreq() is
never called from inetsw. Situation in inet and inet6 is analog.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/