Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
>
> +1, I wondered if we should do this when reading the 11n diffs.
>
> If people need more speed it's likely that they will get better
> performance with 20MHz channels on a newer radio/MAC than 40MHz
> on a 10-year-old one.
>
> Free the spectrum!
i'
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:11:08AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Agreed. I don't have any working ath(4) hardware to test this. This
> diff introduces some long (>80 characters) lines; you might want to
> fix that before you commit it.
Sure, I will fix the long lines.
I'm building a release wit
On 2016/01/11 11:11, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:30:27 +0100
> > From: Stefan Sperling
> >
> > This diff removes turbo mode, which is a proprietary extension offered
> > by Atheros devices of the ath(4) 11a/b/g generation. This seems to be
> > a channel bonding technique, s
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:30:27 +0100
> From: Stefan Sperling
>
> This diff removes turbo mode, which is a proprietary extension offered
> by Atheros devices of the ath(4) 11a/b/g generation. This seems to be
> a channel bonding technique, similar to 11n 40 MHz channels but not
> interoperable
This diff removes turbo mode, which is a proprietary extension offered
by Atheros devices of the ath(4) 11a/b/g generation. This seems to be
a channel bonding technique, similar to 11n 40 MHz channels but not
interoperable with 11n.
I'd like to remove this because the implementation looks incomple
