On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:46:54PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:34:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Guess we should make the 3 fatalx() in that code different so that it
> > > becomes more clear o
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:34:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Guess we should make the 3 fatalx() in that code different so that it
> > becomes more clear on which call it fails.
>
> As in the diff below?
>
> > Wonder what ki
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Guess we should make the 3 fatalx() in that code different so that it
> becomes more clear on which call it fails.
As in the diff below?
> Wonder what kind of startup race we lose...
I can reproduce one of the errors on my laptop:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:59PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:04:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > And I am waiting for my loop to fail ...
>
> Now I have got a different error:
>
> execute: ssh ot2 perl -I /usr/src/regress/usr.sbin/relayd
> /usr/src/regress/
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:04:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Does not happen here. Running
> > while make run-regress-args-https-inspect.pl ; do echo -n; done
> > for a few minutes now and no failure.
>
> It takes a while
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:04:49PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> And I am waiting for my loop to fail ...
Now I have got a different error:
execute: ssh ot2 perl -I /usr/src/regress/usr.sbin/relayd
/usr/src/regress/usr.sbin/relayd/remote.pl copy 10.188.81.22 10.188.81.21 37198
/usr/src/regres
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:40:33PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Does not happen here. Running
> while make run-regress-args-https-inspect.pl ; do echo -n; done
> for a few minutes now and no failure.
It takes a while. I am running it on
- very old and slow i386 machine, different timing
-
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:27:50PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Instead of using imsg to pass certificates, pass the fd to the cert to the
> > relay processes. This allows for large certificates and esp. ca file to
> > work. OCSP
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:23:29PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Instead of using imsg to pass certificates, pass the fd to the cert to the
> relay processes. This allows for large certificates and esp. ca file to
> work. OCSP stapling will also be added through this.
relayd regression tests pass
Instead of using imsg to pass certificates, pass the fd to the cert to the
relay processes. This allows for large certificates and esp. ca file to
work. OCSP stapling will also be added through this.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: ca.c
=
10 matches
Mail list logo