Kapetanakis Giannis(bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr) on 2017.11.29 11:40:41 +0200:
> On 28/11/17 17:06, Sebastian benoit wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > your diff looks good, but i would rather do it the way bgpd/bgpctl do it:
> >
> > there the default is? /var/run/bgpd.sock. where is the
> > routing domain b
On 28/11/17 17:06, Sebastian benoit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> your diff looks good, but i would rather do it the way bgpd/bgpctl do it:
>
> there the default is /var/run/bgpd.sock. where is the
> routing domain bgpctl is running in. To administer bgpd(8) in a different
> routing domain, run bgpctl in
bgpd uses that way *because* it can use an alternate socket. Being able
to specify a different socket for daemon/client is pretty helpful.
On 2017 Nov 28 (Tue) at 16:06:51 +0100 (+0100), Sebastian benoit wrote:
:Hi,
:
:your diff looks good, but i would rather do it the way bgpd/bgpctl do it:
:
:
But what about people not running relay on rdomain, but rather just want to run
separate
instances of relayd ?
> 28 nov. 2017 kl. 16:06 skrev Sebastian benoit
> :
>
> Hi,
>
> your diff looks good, but i would rather do it the way bgpd/bgpctl do it:
>
> there the default is /var/run/bgpd.so
Hi,
your diff looks good, but i would rather do it the way bgpd/bgpctl do it:
there the default is /var/run/bgpd.sock. where is
the routing domain bgpctl is running in. To administer bgpd(8) in a
different routing domain, run bgpctl in said routing domain.
i.e. it detects the rdomain at s
Hi,
On June I've posted a patch about using alternative control socket for relayd
and relayctl.
There was a comment from David Gwynne which was evaluated.
Is it OK to get this is in order to be able to control multiple relayd daemons
on different rdomains?
thanks
Giannis
Index: config.c
===
On 23/06/17 11:07, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 23/06/17 04:43, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 Jun 2017, at 01:15, Kapetanakis Giannis
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is a patch for using alternative control socket for relayd and
>>> relayctl.
>>> It's based on ospfd. I would like for t
On 23/06/17 04:43, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> On 23 Jun 2017, at 01:15, Kapetanakis Giannis
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a patch for using alternative control socket for relayd and relayctl.
>> It's based on ospfd. I would like for this to get in order to be able to
>> control multiple relay
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 01:15, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for using alternative control socket for relayd and relayctl.
> It's based on ospfd. I would like for this to get in order to be able to
> control multiple relayd daemons on different rdomains.
i had somethi
Hi,
Here is a patch for using alternative control socket for relayd and relayctl.
It's based on ospfd. I would like for this to get in order to be able to
control multiple relayd daemons on different rdomains.
regards,
Giannis
Index: relayd.8
===
10 matches
Mail list logo
